From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hirsch v. Hirsch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 4, 1974
296 So. 2d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Summary

In Hirsch v. Hirsch, 296 So.2d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), we affirmed a February 8, 1974 order which temporarily modified, pendente lite, the support payment from $110 to $180 per week. Because of this action, upon which Mrs. Hirsch has relied, we do not order, as did the court in Gardner v. Gardner, supra, that she repay to Mr. Hirsch the $70 per week difference she has received in the meantime, even though we now hold the increase to have been unjustified under the New York law.

Summary of this case from Hirsch v. Hirsch

Opinion

No. 74-310.

June 4, 1974.

Interlocutory appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; William A. Herin, Judge.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hirsch v. Hirsch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 4, 1974
296 So. 2d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

In Hirsch v. Hirsch, 296 So.2d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), we affirmed a February 8, 1974 order which temporarily modified, pendente lite, the support payment from $110 to $180 per week. Because of this action, upon which Mrs. Hirsch has relied, we do not order, as did the court in Gardner v. Gardner, supra, that she repay to Mr. Hirsch the $70 per week difference she has received in the meantime, even though we now hold the increase to have been unjustified under the New York law.

Summary of this case from Hirsch v. Hirsch
Case details for

Hirsch v. Hirsch

Case Details

Full title:MOE HIRSCH, APPELLANT, v. FAY HIRSCH, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 4, 1974

Citations

296 So. 2d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Citing Cases

Hirsch v. Hirsch

The final judgment under review is therefore reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to deny the…