Opinion
January 26, 1976
In a defamation action, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 18, 1974, which (a) denied her motion for summary judgment and (b) dismissed the complaint and (2) the judgment of the same court, entered thereon on September 10, 1975. Order and judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Since both the oral and written communications were qualifiedly privileged (see Byam v Collins, 111 N.Y. 143, 150; Bingham v Gaynor, 203 N.Y. 27, 31), it was "incumbent upon plaintiff to establish by evidentiary facts its allegation of actual malice" in order to surmount the privilege (Kremer Constr. Co., v Garfinkel, 31 A.D.2d 766; see, also, Shapiro v Health Ins. Plan of Greater N.Y., 7 N.Y.2d 56). This the plaintiff has failed to establish. Gulotta, P.J., Latham, Margett, Damiani and Christ, JJ., concur.