From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HIRN v. BEHRER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

October, 1916.


It would seem that the plaintiff intentionally suffered his default to be taken after failure of his forecast when his case, then on the ready calendar, would be reached for trial. The terms imposed are too light. The order is, therefore, modified to make the opening of the default conditioned upon the payment of forty dollars, and as so modified it is affirmed, without costs, but with disbursements to the appellant. Jenks, P.J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

HIRN v. BEHRER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

HIRN v. BEHRER

Case Details

Full title:LUDWIG HIRN, Respondent, v. ARNOLD BEHRER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)