From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinz v. Starin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1891
27 N.E. 411 (N.Y. 1891)

Opinion

Argued January 26, 1891

Decided February 24, 1891

Martin J. Keogh for appellant.

William W. Goodrich for respondent.


Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except BRADLEY, VANN and BROWN, JJ., dissenting.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Hinz v. Starin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1891
27 N.E. 411 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for

Hinz v. Starin

Case Details

Full title:JOHN R. HINZ, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v . JOHN H. STARIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 24, 1891

Citations

27 N.E. 411 (N.Y. 1891)
27 N.E. 411
36 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1014