From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hintze v. Kaufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 1962
15 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

February 26, 1962


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 1, 1961, which granted the motion of her former attorney, Alexander Kosloff, for permission to withdraw as her attorney in the action. Defendant is the owner of three adjoining buildings, two of which are insured by the Manhattan Casualty Company and the third by the Glens Falls Insurance Company. Originally, plaintiff claimed that his injuries were caused by the negligence of defendant in the maintenance of the buildings insured by the Manhattan Casualty Company. Plaintiff now claims, however, that his injuries were caused by the negligence of defendant in the maintenance of the building insured by the Glens Falls Insurance Company. In effect, the order appealed from permits the withdrawal of the Manhattan Casualty Company's attorney as the attorney for the defendant in this action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements payable by the attorneys who appeared specially for the defendant. Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hintze v. Kaufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 1962
15 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Hintze v. Kaufman

Case Details

Full title:OTTO HINTZE, Plaintiff, v. MINNIE KAUFMAN, Appellant. ALEXANDER KOSLOFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 1962

Citations

15 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Matter of Beedenbender v. State

The disclaimer of coverage by the insurance company, Sutera's actual client, places the firm in a precarious…