From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinton v. Murray

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 18, 2011
450 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6918

10-18-2011

CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LINDA LOPEZ; ANDREW MURRAY; CHRISTIAN HOEL; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE 2; WILLIAM ROBERT BELL, Defendants - Appellees.

Charles Everette Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00316-RJC)

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Everette Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Everette Hinton appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinton v. Lopez, No. 3:11-cv-00316-RJC (W.D.N.C. July 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hinton v. Murray

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 18, 2011
450 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Hinton v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LINDA LOPEZ; ANDREW…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

450 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2011)