From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinton v. Murray

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 2, 2011
442 F. App'x 21 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6596

08-02-2011

CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANDREW MURRAY; CHRISTIAN HOEL; WILLIAM ROBERT BELL; JOHN DOE, Judicial Official for North Carolina and Mediator for State of North Carolina; FNU PROCTOR, Magistrate; FNU DIGGS, Magistrate; JOHN DOE, District Court Judge on File Number 11-cr-216164, Defendants - Appellees.

Charles Everette Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00198-RJC) Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Everette Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Everette Hinton appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinton v. Murray, No. 3:11-cv-00198-RJC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hinton v. Murray

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 2, 2011
442 F. App'x 21 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Hinton v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANDREW MURRAY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

442 F. App'x 21 (4th Cir. 2011)