Opinion
No. 16-6934
12-13-2016
DONALD LEE HINTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER ANDERSON; C/O MULLEN; SGT. PROFIT, Defendants - Appellees, and NURSE O'CONNER; NURSE MALINGALIN; NURSE SHEYBANI; OFFICER WAD; SGT. SIZEMORE; POCAHONTAS CORRECTIONAL CENTER; C/O BUCKLES; NURSE HEADLY; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; OFFICER C. ALFORD; C/O HASTING; SGT. CABWELL; C/O HOWARD; NURSE LOCKHART; SERGEANT NEAL; NURSE STRAWBERRY; SERGEANT THORNTON; LIEUTENANT WATTS; PSYCHOLOGIST BLAND; HEARINGS OFFICER J. BRANDY; NURSE BOOTH; HEAD NURSE SUE YATES, Defendants.
Donald Lee Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorneys General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:14-cv-00197-MFU-RSB) Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Lee Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorneys General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Donald Lee Hinton appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinton v. Anderson, No. 7:14-cv-00197-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. May 27 & June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED