From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinson v. Hinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1897
27 S.E. 80 (N.C. 1897)

Opinion

(February Term, 1897.)

Action for Waste — Tenants in Common — Waste.

Under Section 627 of The Code, one tenant in common may sue his co-tenant for waste.

ACTION by plaintiffs as tenants in common against their co-tenants and life tenant for waste, heard before Norwood, J., at Spring Term, 1897, of STANLY. Upon an intimation by the court that plaintiffs could not maintain the action, they suffered a nonsuit and appealed.

Messrs. Adams Jerome for plaintiffs (appellants).

Mr. S. J. Pemberton for defendants.


The plaintiffs and defendants are tenants in common of the locus in quo, except the defendant Millie, who has a life estate, as doweress, in the same. The action is for waste committed by the defendants. It is agreed that defendants have cut down trees for crossties and hauled them off the land. His Honor was of opinion that plaintiffs, being co-tenants with defendants, could not recover in this action, and that their remedy was by account. However this may have been at common law, our statute expressly authorizes this action in a case like the present. The Code, sec. 627.

Error.

Cited: Morrison v. Morrison, 122 N.C. 599.

(401)


Summaries of

Hinson v. Hinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1897
27 S.E. 80 (N.C. 1897)
Case details for

Hinson v. Hinson

Case Details

Full title:J. H. HINSON ET ALS. v. MILLIE HINSON ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1897

Citations

27 S.E. 80 (N.C. 1897)
120 N.C. 400

Citing Cases

Morrison v. Morrison

The right to sue for the waste included the right to restrain its commission. The same question upon a…

Daniel v. Power Co.

The cutting of trees may be waste and for waste one tenant in common may sue another. C. S., 891; Hinson v.…