From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinsdale Manufacturning Co. v. Root

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jun 23, 1948
335 Ill. App. 124 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)

Opinion

Gen. No. 44,375. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 23, 1948 Released for publication July 12, 1948

JUDGMENTS, § 150propriety of denying motion to vacate ex parte judgment. Evidence that defendants' former attorney left defendants' employment without notifying defendant of his abandonment of their defense to plaintiff's action and that defendants "thought plaintiff had dropped the suit" warranted denial of defendants' motion to vacate ex parte judgment after 30 days on grounds that defendants were "negligent" in not obtaining another attorney after former one left their employ and were imprudent in assuming that plaintiff had dropped action (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, ch. 110, par. 196; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 104.072).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. HARRY M. FISHER, Judge, presiding.

Order affirmed. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the February term, 1948.

Raymond I. Suekoff, for appellants;

Bartoline Jones, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed June 23, 1948; released for publication July 12, 1948.


Summaries of

Hinsdale Manufacturning Co. v. Root

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jun 23, 1948
335 Ill. App. 124 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
Case details for

Hinsdale Manufacturning Co. v. Root

Case Details

Full title:Hinsdale Manufacturing Company, Appellee, v. Martin Root, Nathan Root and…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Jun 23, 1948

Citations

335 Ill. App. 124 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
80 N.E.2d 454

Citing Cases

Turner et al. v. Yates

7. That under the circumstances of this case, and in view of the relation of the plaintiffs in error, Purvis…

State Loan Etc. Co. v. Cochran

The act of one of the cosureties in consenting to the disposition of the collaterals of the deceased…