Hinojosa v. Bee Hous. Auth.

Full title: CRYSTAL HINOJOSA, Appellant, v. BEE HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee.

Court: COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Jul 10, 2014

NUMBER 13-14-00106-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 10, 2014)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00106-CV

07-10-2014

CRYSTAL HINOJOSA, Appellant, v. BEE HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee.

PER CURIAM

On Appeal from the County Court

of Bee County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on June 3, 2014. On June 9, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file her brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM