Hinojos v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Full title: EDWARD S. HINOJOS, Plaintiff, v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF…

Court: United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Dec 21, 2010

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01193-CG-LAM (D.N.M. Dec. 21, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01193-CG-LAM.

December 21, 2010

Joshua T. Worley, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Robert P. Warburton, Attorney for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

CARMEN GARZA, Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time For Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Original Complaint. (Doc. 5). The Court, having considered the Motion, noting that it is unopposed, and being fully advised in the premises, FINDS that the Motion is well taken and should be granted.

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall have until January 10, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.