From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinojos v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2017
Case No. CV 16-4249 R (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-4249 R (FFM)

03-22-2017

DAVID ELIAS HINOJOS, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections to the Report. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. DATED: March 22, 2017

/s/_________

MANUEL L. REAL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hinojos v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2017
Case No. CV 16-4249 R (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Hinojos v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ELIAS HINOJOS, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 22, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 16-4249 R (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2017)