Hinojos v. Honeywell FMT

Full title: GILBERT J. HINOJOS, Plaintiff, v. HONEYWELL FMT, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Aug 19, 2005

Civ. No. 04-0779 MV/RHS (D.N.M. Aug. 19, 2005)

Opinion

Civ. No. 04-0779 MV/RHS.

August 19, 2005

Gilbert J. Vigil, Esq., Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Jeffrey L. Lowry, Esq., Jill Marchant, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARTHA VAZQUEZ, District Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Motion to Stay All Discovery, filed October 15, 2004, [Doc. No. 10], and Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Ruling on Motion to Dismiss, filed November 12, 2004, [Doc. No. 14]. Both of Plaintiff's motions seek additional time to respond to Defendant's pending motions because Plaintiff was in the process of locating representation. The Magistrate Judge granted Defendant's Motion to Stay All Discovery. See October 27, 2004 Order. Plaintiff subsequently obtained legal counsel and responded to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Motion to Stay All Discovery, filed October 15, 2004, [Doc. No. 10], and Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Ruling on Motion to Dismiss, filed November 12, 2004, [Doc. No. 14], are DENIED as moot.