From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hines v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Nov 10, 2020
Case No. CIV-20-518-G (W.D. Okla. Nov. 10, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-20-518-G

11-10-2020

CHARLES HINES, Petitioner, v. WARDEN S. YOUNG, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner Charles Hines, a federal prisoner, filed this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking habeas relief. See Pet. (Doc. No. 1). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell for preliminary review.

On July 29, 2020, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 9), in which she recommended the habeas petition be dismissed due to a lack of statutory jurisdiction. In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Mitchell advised Petitioner of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by August 19, 2020. Judge Mitchell also advised that a failure to timely object would constitute a waiver of the right to appellate review of the factual findings and legal conclusions contained in the Report and Recommendation.

As of this date, Petitioner has not submitted any objection to the Report and Recommendation or sought leave for additional time to do so.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 9) is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. A separate judgment shall be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of November, 2020.

/s/_________

CHARLES B. GOODWIN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hines v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Nov 10, 2020
Case No. CIV-20-518-G (W.D. Okla. Nov. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Hines v. Young

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HINES, Petitioner, v. WARDEN S. YOUNG, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Nov 10, 2020

Citations

Case No. CIV-20-518-G (W.D. Okla. Nov. 10, 2020)