From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hines v. Taylor

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 19, 2010
9:07-CV-902 (LEK/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2010)

Opinion

9:07-CV-902 (LEK/RFT).

August 19, 2010


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on July 28, 2010 by the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 23). On August 6, 2010, Petitioner James Hines ("Petitioner") filed objections to Report-Recommendation. Dkt. No. 24 ("Objections").

This Court is to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. The Court has considered the Objections, undertaken a de novo review of the record, and determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 23) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED, and it is further

ORDERED, that no certificate of appealability shall issue with respect to any of Petitioner's claims, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hines v. Taylor

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 19, 2010
9:07-CV-902 (LEK/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Hines v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:JAMES HINES, Petitioner, v. J. TAYLOR, Superintendent, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Aug 19, 2010

Citations

9:07-CV-902 (LEK/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2010)