From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hines v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Nov 7, 2018
260 So. 3d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D18-3936

11-07-2018

Charles E. HINES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Charles E. Hines, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Charles E. Hines, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

Wetherell, Makar, and Winsor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hines v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Nov 7, 2018
260 So. 3d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Hines v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. HINES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Nov 7, 2018

Citations

260 So. 3d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)