Hines v. Flores

Full title: HERBERT HINES, Appellant v. JOE FLORES, Appellee

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Apr 10, 2003

No. 09-02-519 CV (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2003)

Opinion

No. 09-02-519 CV.

Opinion Delivered April 10, 2003.

Appeal from the 258th District Court Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19,484.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., BURGESS and GAULTNEY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION¹

1 Tex.R.App.P. 47.4

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied Herbert Hines's motion for default judgment on October 28, 2002. Hines filed notice of appeal on November 11, 2002. On January 16, 2003, we notified the appellant that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal. On February 18, 2003, Hines filed an amended notice of appeal that stated that the appeal was taken under Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon 2002). We requested a clarification, and on April 2, 2003, Hines filed a response that stated that an accelerated interlocutory appeal was authorized pursuant to Section 51.014(d). To pursue an appeal under that subsection, the trial court must issue an order for an interlocutory appeal, not just sign an interlocutory order as is the case here. Id. Because the trial court has not entered an order for an interlocutory appeal under Section 51.014(d), the trial court's order of October 28, 2002, is not appealable. The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.