Hines v. Beckner

Full title: HINES v. BECKNER et al.; and vice versa

Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 1, 1940

7 S.E.2d 613 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)

61 Ga. App. 805

Opinion

27858, 27859.

DECIDED MARCH 1, 1940.

Damages; from Bainbridge city court — Judge Rich. June 12, 1939.

A. B. Conger, for plaintiff. H. G. Bell, for defendants.

BROYLES, C. J.

In this case a nonsuit was awarded, and the only assignment of error in the main bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of a motion for new trial. Since a judgment of nonsuit can not be reviewed by a motion for new trial, the court did not err in overruling the motion. DeLoach v. Hicks, 54 Ga. App. 405 ( 187 S.E. 886). In view of this ruling, it is not necessary to consider the cross-bill of exceptions.

Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed. MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

DECIDED MARCH 1, 1940.