From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hindman v. Teague

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 22, 1985
481 So. 2d 369 (Ala. 1985)

Opinion

83-1271.

November 22, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Montgomery County, Charles Price, J.

William J. Underwood, Tuscumbia, for appellant.

Charles S. Coody, Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Educ., State of Ala., for appellee.


ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU


This Court's original opinion dated June 21, 1985, is withdrawn and the following is substituted in its place.

Plaintiff/appellant Dan Hindman sought to have his name placed on the ballot for Superintendent of Education of Franklin County. The state superintendent refused to certify him as a candidate, because, in the state superintendent's opinion, Hindman did not meet statutory qualifications. Code 1975, § 16-9-2.

Hindman sought declaratory and injunctive relief which would have enabled him to have his name placed on the ballot as a candidate for election to the office of superintendent. The trial judge denied Hindman's motion for a temporary restraining order, and Hindman appealed here.

We have determined that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Hindman's request for injunctive relief; therefore, the cause is due to be affirmed.

ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU: OPINION WITHDRAWN; OPINION SUBSTITUTED; AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hindman v. Teague

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 22, 1985
481 So. 2d 369 (Ala. 1985)
Case details for

Hindman v. Teague

Case Details

Full title:Dan HINDMAN v. Dr. Wayne TEAGUE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 22, 1985

Citations

481 So. 2d 369 (Ala. 1985)