From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hindman v. Jensen

Supreme Court of Iowa
Dec 13, 1966
147 N.W.2d 8 (Iowa 1966)

Opinion

No. 52195.

December 13, 1966.

INTOXICATING LIQUORS: Dram Shop Law — liability to estate of 1 one killed by intoxicated person. An estate representative of a person killed by reason of intoxication of one supplied with liquor has a cause of action under the Dram Shop Law. Section 123.95, Code of 1966.

INTOXICATING LIQUORS: Dram Shop Law — civil action under the

law survives decedent. 123.95611.20

Appeal from Linn District Court — HAROLD D. VIETOR, Judge.

Trial court sustained defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff-administratrix' action at law for damages under Dram Shop Act, Code section 123.95, and plaintiff was granted leave to appeal. — Reversed and remanded for entry of order overruling defendant's motion.

Shuttleworth Ingersoll, of Cedar Rapids, for appellant.

Simmons, Perrine, Albright Ellwood, of Cedar Rapids, for appellee.


By an action at law plaintiff seeks damages from defendant, her petition being in two divisions.

Division I, not involved in this appeal, asserts a cause of action under our Dram Shop Act, chapters 114, section 29, and 115, section 8, Acts of the Sixtieth General Assembly (section 123.95, Code, 1966), by plaintiff individually, as surviving mother, for loss of support occasioned by the death of her adult son.

By Division II plaintiff, as administratrix of her deceased son's estate asks damages from defendant, a licensee or permittee under Code chapter 123, alleging he supplied liquor on about January 18, 1964, to one Donald Raisanen, who then became intoxicated, that plaintiff's decedent was an occupant in an automobile operated by Raisanen which due to his intoxication became involved in an accident causing the immediate death of plaintiff's decedent. We shall here deal with Division II as plaintiff's cause of action.

Defendant's motion to dismiss Division II of the petition was sustained by the trial court and plaintiff was granted leave to appeal.

[1] The question presented is whether an estate representative of a person killed by reason of intoxication of one supplied with liquor has a cause of action under section 123.95 against the supplier.

I. This and a separate case involving the same issue as here presented were argued and submitted to us on the same day.

II. Simultaneously with the filing of this opinion our opinion in the aforesaid separate case of Wendelin v. Russell, 259 Iowa 1152, 147 N.W.2d 188, is being filed, in which we consider the applicable statutes and principles of law here involved.

[2] We there held the civil action of a person killed by an intoxicated person, under section 123.95, survives the decedent and may be pursued by his estate representative under and by virtue of sections 611.20 and 611.22.

Our holding in Wendelin v. Russell, supra, is decisive of this appeal.

III. The trial court erred in sustaining defendant's motion to dismiss Division II of plaintiff's petition. This case must be reversed and remanded for entry by the trial court of an order overruling defendant's motion to dismiss. — Reversed and remanded for entry of order overruling defendant's motion.

All JUSTICES concur except THORNTON, J., not sitting, and STUART, J., taking no part.


Summaries of

Hindman v. Jensen

Supreme Court of Iowa
Dec 13, 1966
147 N.W.2d 8 (Iowa 1966)
Case details for

Hindman v. Jensen

Case Details

Full title:GLADYS HINDMAN, individually (not appealing) and GLADYS HINDMAN, as…

Court:Supreme Court of Iowa

Date published: Dec 13, 1966

Citations

147 N.W.2d 8 (Iowa 1966)
147 N.W.2d 8

Citing Cases

Kendall v. Gauthier

No useful purpose will be served by a further discussion of the well-presented arguments of the parties…