From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinck v. Hinck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2007
44 A.D.3d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-10642.

October 2, 2007.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J.), dated October 23, 2006, which denied her motion, in effect, for summary judgment setting aside the parties' postnuptial agreement.

Seth Muraskin, Huntington, N.Y., for appellant.

Clifford J. Petroske, Bohemia, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Crane, J.P., Lifson, Carni and Balkin, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant's motion, in effect, for summary judgment.


Summaries of

Hinck v. Hinck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2007
44 A.D.3d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Hinck v. Hinck

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG HINCK, Respondent, v. KERRY HINCK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7401
841 N.Y.S.2d 884

Citing Cases

Hinck v. Hinck

Defendant now moves for an order dismissing all of the claims in plaintiff's plenary action. He maintains…