From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinchliffe v. Loughlin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1941
22 A.2d 240 (N.J. 1941)

Opinion

Submitted May 31, 1941 —

Decided October 20, 1941.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 126 N.J.L. 132.

For the appellant, Hugh C. Spernow.

For the respondents, Eugene F. Hillery and Beam Kelly.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 11.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, COLIE, JJ. 2.


Summaries of

Hinchliffe v. Loughlin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1941
22 A.2d 240 (N.J. 1941)
Case details for

Hinchliffe v. Loughlin

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM F. HINCHLIFFE, TRUSTEE, ETC., APPELLANT, v. AGNES LOUGHLIN ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 20, 1941

Citations

22 A.2d 240 (N.J. 1941)
22 A.2d 240

Citing Cases

Community Development Co., Inc. v. Seaside Gardens, Inc.

Under the state of facts presented here by the allegations of the complaint and the affidavits, the terms of…

Bayonne v. Ferenczi

Under the provisions of the statute as applied here to the facts neither the legality of the certificates nor…