From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Himes v. Five Below, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 28, 2024
Civil Action 24-3638 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-3638 24-4905

10-28-2024

TYLER HIMES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. FIVE BELOW, INC. and JOEL ANDERSON CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE OFFICERS PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. FIVE BELOW, INC., JOEL ANDERSON, KENNETH BULL, and KRISTY CHIPMAN


ORDER

GERALD AUSTIN MCHUGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This 28th day of October, 2024 it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. With respect to consolidation, Movants' unopposed requests to consolidate these matters (No. 24-3638, ECFs 14, 15, 16, 17, 18; No. 24-4905, ECF 3) are GRANTED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) in light of the common issues of law and fact that predominate both cases. Prospectively, Himes v. Five Below, Inc. et al., No. 24-3638 and City of Orlando Police Officers Pension Fund v. Five Below, Inc., et al., No. 24-4905 are CONSOLIDATED as: In re Five Below, Inc. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 24-3638.
2. The file in Case No. 24-3638 shall constitute the Master File for every action in the consolidated action. It is REQUESTED that the Clerk administratively close the other action (24-4905). All orders, pleadings, motions, and other documents, when filed and docketed in the Master File, shall be deemed filed and docketed in each individual case to the extent applicable. When the document being filed pertains to all actions, parties should write “This Document Relates To: All Actions” in the caption beneath “In re Five Below, Inc. Securities Litigation.” When a pleading applies to some, but not all, of the actions, the caption should list “This Document Relates To:” followed by the docket number for the individual action to which the document applies, along with the last name of the first-listed plaintiff in said action.
a. This Order is entered without prejudice to the rights of any party to apply for severance of any claim or action, with good cause shown.
3. Upon consideration of the Motions for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel filed by all Movants,and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Arkansas Funds Group's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel is GRANTED. All other Movants' motions are DENIED with respect to the appointment of lead plaintiff and counsel. The Arkansas Funds Group shall be Lead Plaintiff and Berger Montague PC and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP shall be Co-Lead Counsel for
consolidated cases In re Five Below, Inc. Securities Litigation (24-3638 and 244905).

The Movants consist of the Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System (“Arkansas Funds Group”) (Himes, ECF 17), David Felton (Himes, ECF 15), Nova Scotia Public Service Superannuation Plan (Himes, ECF 18), and Trevor Bixby (Himes, ECF 16). Mohammed Rahman also filed a Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel, but withdrew his motion. Himes, ECF 21. David Felton and the Nova Scotia Public Service Superannuation Plan both filed Notices of Non-Opposition to the Arkansas Funds Group's Motion. Himes, ECF 19, ECF 20.


Summaries of

Himes v. Five Below, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 28, 2024
Civil Action 24-3638 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Himes v. Five Below, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TYLER HIMES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 28, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-3638 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2024)