From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Himelein v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1989
155 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 15, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, Horey, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion to dismiss denied, motion for default judgment granted and Clerk of Supreme Court directed to enter judgment accordingly. Memorandum: Defendant never appeared in this action brought under CPLR article 13A. Plaintiff's claim was for a sum certain and application for a default judgment could have been made to the Clerk (see, CPLR 3215 [a]). In the circumstances presented, the court had no authority to appoint counsel sua sponte or to entertain a motion to dismiss the complaint. Upon plaintiff's compliance with CPLR 3215 (e) the Clerk shall enter judgment.


Summaries of

Himelein v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1989
155 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Himelein v. Frank

Case Details

Full title:LARRY M. HIMELEIN, as Cattaraugus County District Attorney, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Morgenthau v. Rodriguez

Such ruling was erroneous. Should a court determine that a plaintiff's affidavit in support of its motion for…