From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hilts v. Mental Health Partners of Boulder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 23, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00080-GPG (D. Colo. Feb. 23, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-cv-00080-GPG

02-23-2015

JAHEEM RASHON MARCUS ANTHONY HILTS, Plaintiff, v. MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS OF BOULDER, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Jaheem Rashon Marcus Anthony Hilts, is a patient at the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Fort Logan in Denver, Colorado. Mr. Hilts initiated this action by filing pro se a Complaint (ECF No. 1). On January 14, 2015, Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher ordered Mr. Hilts to file an amended complaint that complies with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mr. Hilts was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to file an amended complaint within thirty days.

Mr. Hilts has failed to file an amended complaint that complies with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 within the time allowed and he has failed to respond in any way to Magistrate Judge Gallagher's January 14 order. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order. Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Complaint (ECF No. 1) and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Mr. Hilts failed to prosecute and comply with a court order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 23rd day of February, 2015.

BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Hilts v. Mental Health Partners of Boulder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 23, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00080-GPG (D. Colo. Feb. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Hilts v. Mental Health Partners of Boulder

Case Details

Full title:JAHEEM RASHON MARCUS ANTHONY HILTS, Plaintiff, v. MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 23, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-cv-00080-GPG (D. Colo. Feb. 23, 2015)