From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hilton v. Merck & Co.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Jul 7, 2022
5:22-CV-030-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jul. 7, 2022)

Opinion

5:22-CV-030-KDB-DCK

07-07-2022

KAMERON HILTON, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC., and MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP., Defendants.


ORDER

David C. Keesler, United States Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 18) filed by Theodore C. Edwards, II, concerning Dino S. Sangiamo, on July 7, 2022. Dino S. Sangiamo seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendants. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee and information, the Court will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 18) is GRANTED. Dino S. Sangiamo is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendants.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hilton v. Merck & Co.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Jul 7, 2022
5:22-CV-030-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jul. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Hilton v. Merck & Co.

Case Details

Full title:KAMERON HILTON, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC., and MERCK, SHARP & DOHME…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division

Date published: Jul 7, 2022

Citations

5:22-CV-030-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jul. 7, 2022)