From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hilsman v. Hilsman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 2, 1983
438 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-638.

September 14, 1983. Rehearing Denied November 2, 1983.

Appeal and cross-appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Richard B. Burk, Judge.

Robert M. Curtis of Saunders, Curtis, Ginestra Gore, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Montgomery, Lytal, Reiter, Denney Searcy, P.A. and Barbara J. Compiani of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee/cross-appellant.


Based on the authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980), we affirm the final judgment of dissolution in all respects except for the provision which requires the former husband to maintain life insurance for the benefit of each child "during the child's minority and through college." (Emphasis supplied). On remand, we direct the trial court to delete the phrase, "and through college." See Blum v. Blum, 382 So.2d 52 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Kern v. Kern, 360 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and WESSEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Hilsman v. Hilsman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 2, 1983
438 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Hilsman v. Hilsman

Case Details

Full title:HARRY T. HILSMAN, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, v. BARBARA PAULETTE HILSMAN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 2, 1983

Citations

438 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Angle v. Angle

Therefore, on remand, we direct the trial court to strike the provisions of the amended final judgment…