From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hilltop Med. Diagnostic & Treatment Ctr. v. Clarendon Nat'l Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York, Second Department.
Dec 23, 2011
946 N.Y.S.2d 66 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010–2532 N C.

2011-12-23

HILLTOP MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER as Assignee of Frantz Guillame, Respondent, v. CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.


PRESENT: NICOLAI, P.J., MOLIA and IANNACCI, JJ.

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, Second District (Michael A. Ciaffa, J.), dated July 7, 2010. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

In support of its motion, defendant submitted an affidavit of an employee of its claims division, which demonstrated that defendant had timely denied the claim on the ground of lack of medical necessity ( see Richard Morgan Do, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 22 Misc.3d 134[A], 2009 N.Y. Slip Op 50242[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2009]; Chi Acupuncture, P.C. v. Kemper Auto & Home Ins. Co., 14 Misc.3d 141[A], 2007 N.Y. Slip Op 50352[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2007] ). Contrary to the conclusion of the District Court, the affirmed report of defendant's peer reviewer set forth a sufficient medical rationale and factual basis to demonstrate a lack of medical necessity for the services at issue ( see B.Y., M.D., P.C. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 26 Misc.3d 135[A], 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 50144[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2010]; see also A.B. Med. Servs., PLLC v. Country–Wide Ins. Co., 23 Misc.3d 140[A], 2009 N.Y. Slip Op 51016[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2009] ), so as to shift the burden to plaintiff to rebut defendant's prima facie showing.

In opposition to defendant's motion, plaintiff failed to submit any medical evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to medical necessity ( see Speciality Surgical Servs. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 27 Misc.3d 134[A], 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 50715[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2010]; A. Khodadadi Radiology, P.C. v. N.Y. Cent. Mut.Fire Ins. Co., 16 Misc.3d 131 [A], 2007 N.Y. Slip Op 51342[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007] ). Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

NICOLAI, P.J., MOLIA and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hilltop Med. Diagnostic & Treatment Ctr. v. Clarendon Nat'l Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York, Second Department.
Dec 23, 2011
946 N.Y.S.2d 66 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Hilltop Med. Diagnostic & Treatment Ctr. v. Clarendon Nat'l Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HILLTOP MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER as Assignee of Frantz…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York, Second Department.

Date published: Dec 23, 2011

Citations

946 N.Y.S.2d 66 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)