From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hillsborough County Sch. Bd. v. Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 20, 1991
573 So. 2d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-88.

December 3, 1990. Rehearing Denied February 20, 1991.

Matthew B. Wheeley, Tampa, for appellant.

William H. Yanger, Jr. of Yanger Yanger, Tampa, for appellee.


In this appeal of a workers' compensation order, the employer/carrier (e/c) challenge an award of rehabilitation expenses which purported to reimburse claimant for her transportation to and from work. E/c contend that claimant failed to establish entitlement to rehabilitation benefits where she returned to her old job without suffering a reduction in wages. Moreover, e/c point out that transportation to and from work is not awardable as a rehabilitation expense. We agree, and reverse.

Claimant, who taught music at a number of appellant/employer's schools, sustained compensable injuries in a fall on September 17, 1987. Because the injuries included a vertigo problem that prevented claimant from driving, she had to arrange for transportation upon her return to work for employer. Arrangements were frequently made on a day-to-day basis, and claimant would enlist her husband and son to drive her the considerable distance to work when a ride could not be arranged through other sources. In her claim for benefits, claimant sought transportation expenses as a form of rehabilitation.

In awarding the requested benefits, the Judge of Compensation Claims exceeded the scope of the rehabilitation provision. To be eligible for rehabilitation benefits, a claimant must offer competent substantial evidence that her compensable injury prevents her from earning wages equal to those earned prior to the injury. See § 440.49(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987); A.D. Builders, Inc. v. Johnston, 528 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In the instant case, claimant was able to return to work for employer and did not require rehabilitation to achieve her pre-injury wage; thus, the award of rehabilitation benefits was improper. Furthermore, we are directed to no authority in which transportation to and from work was awarded as a rehabilitation benefit.

Accordingly, the award of rehabilitation benefits is REVERSED.

MINER and ALLEN, JJ., and CAWTHON, VICTOR (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Hillsborough County Sch. Bd. v. Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 20, 1991
573 So. 2d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Hillsborough County Sch. Bd. v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND ALEXSIS RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 20, 1991

Citations

573 So. 2d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)