From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hills v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 28, 2018
No. CV 17-3373 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2018)

Opinion

No. CV 17-3373 MWF (FFM)

06-28-2018

RONALD HILLS, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice, except for the California law claims which are dismissed without prejudice for lack of supplemental jurisdiction. DATED: June 28, 2018

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hills v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 28, 2018
No. CV 17-3373 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Hills v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:RONALD HILLS, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 28, 2018

Citations

No. CV 17-3373 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2018)