From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hillman v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
2:20-cv-01601-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01601-WBS-KJN

09-30-2021

DEWAYNE HILLMAN III, an individual, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 25, Defendants.

Michael A. Gould (SBN 151851), THE GOULD LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiff DeWayne Hillman III


Complaint Filed: July 9, 2020

Trial Dated: September 27. 2022

Michael A. Gould (SBN 151851), THE GOULD LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiff DeWayne Hillman III

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

Based on the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice and upon a finding of good cause, the Court hereby orders this action shall be, and is voluntarily DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees, expenses, and costs of court, if any.


Summaries of

Hillman v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
2:20-cv-01601-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Hillman v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DEWAYNE HILLMAN III, an individual, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 30, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01601-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)