From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hilligas v. Veznedaroglu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1983
96 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

July 11, 1983

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.


Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term's order "requiring all future motions and proceedings [herein] to be heard in the Eighth Judicial District by the medical malpractice judge who is assigned by the administrative judge" is not an order affecting a substantial right in an action within the meaning of CPLR 5701 (subd [a], par 2, cl [v]) and thus is not appealable. Were we to reach the merits, we would hold that since a rule or regulation cannot enlarge or abridge rights conferred by statute ( Moot v Moot, 214 N.Y. 204, 211; People ex rel. Mayor of City of N.Y. v Nichols, 79 N.Y. 582, 592), Special Term's directive is a nullity ( Broome County Farmers' Fire Relief Assn. v New York State Elec. Gas Corp., 239 App. Div. 304, 306, affd 264 N.Y. 614).


Summaries of

Hilligas v. Veznedaroglu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1983
96 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Hilligas v. Veznedaroglu

Case Details

Full title:MARY HILLIGAS et al., Respondents, v. MUHTESEM C. VEZNEDAROGLU, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Ildefonso v. Farrell Company, Inc.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( see, Alessi v. County of Nassau, 100 A.D.2d 561). Special…