From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hilliard v. U.S. Parole Commission

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jul 29, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-1553 (ABJ) (D.D.C. Jul. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-1553 (ABJ).

July 29, 2011


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The respondents have filed a timely response to petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See United States' Response to Petition for Habeas Corpus, Docket No. 9. On May 6, 2011, the Court ordered petitioner to reply to the response on or before June 10, 2011, warning that if petitioner failed to file such a reply, on time, "the Court will treat the assertions stated in the opposition as conceded, summarily deny the petition, and dismiss the case." To date, petitioner has not filed a reply. Therefore the Court will treat the assertions stated in respondent's response as conceded, summarily deny the petition, and dismiss this case.

A separate order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion shall issue this date.


Summaries of

Hilliard v. U.S. Parole Commission

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jul 29, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-1553 (ABJ) (D.D.C. Jul. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Hilliard v. U.S. Parole Commission

Case Details

Full title:ARLYN RODRICQUEZ HILLIARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jul 29, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-1553 (ABJ) (D.D.C. Jul. 29, 2011)