From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hillesheim v. Wood Dale Nursing Home

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 1, 2009
771 N.W.2d 513 (Minn. 2009)

Opinion

No. A09-839.

September 1, 2009.

Candice E. Hektner, Law Offices of Candice E. Hektner, Ltd., Bloomington, MN, for respondent.

John M. Hollick, Lynn, Scharfenberg Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for relators.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 14, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Hillesheim v. Wood Dale Nursing Home

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 1, 2009
771 N.W.2d 513 (Minn. 2009)
Case details for

Hillesheim v. Wood Dale Nursing Home

Case Details

Full title:Christine HILLESHEIM, Respondent, v. WOOD DALE NURSING HOME, INC., and SFM…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Sep 1, 2009

Citations

771 N.W.2d 513 (Minn. 2009)