From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hillen v. Di Paolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1984
100 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

April 16, 1984


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rubenfeld, J.), entered May 4, 1983, which, upon "plaintiff's" motion, dismissed the complaint with leave to the plaintiff's administrator to commence a new action within six months pursuant to CPLR 205 (subd [a]). ¶ Order affirmed, with costs. ¶ Notwithstanding the fact that the action was improperly brought in the name of a deceased plaintiff, it was still a timely commenced action for purposes of CPLR 205 (subd [a]) and therefore, since it was not voluntarily discontinued, dismissed for neglect to prosecute, or terminated by a judgment on the merits, plaintiff's administrator may commence a new action within six months ( George v Mount Sinai Hosp., 47 N.Y.2d 170; see Mingone v State of New York, 100 A.D.2d 897; cf. Markoff v South Nassau Community Hosp., 61 N.Y.2d 283). Under the circumstances, the fact that it was the administrator, rather than defendants, who moved to dismiss the clearly improper action in order to expedite the commencement of the new action did not render the termination a voluntary discontinuance. Brown, J.P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hillen v. Di Paolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1984
100 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Hillen v. Di Paolo

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH HILLEN, Respondent, v. IRMA DI PAOLO et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1984

Citations

100 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Mingone v. State

A personal representative who has received letters of administration of the estate of a decedent is the only…

Landau v. Larossa

er v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d 343; GTFM, LLC v Nagy, 18 AD3d 266; Schindler v Issler Schrage, 262…