Hillecke v. U.S.

Full title: MICHAEL A. HILLECKE Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 9, 2002

Civil No. 01-1050-HU (D. Or. Jan. 9, 2002)

Opinion

Civil No. 01-1050-HU

January 9, 2002

ORDER

HAGGERTY, Judge

Magistrate Judge Hubel filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 7, 2001. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED