From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hillcrest Labs., Inc. v. Movea, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 6, 2017
2016-1738 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1738

04-06-2017

HILLCREST LABORATORIES, INC., Appellant v. MOVEA, INC., Appellee

JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by RAJEEV GUPTA, KARTHIK KUMAR. PIERRE YANNEY, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,036.

JUDGMENT

JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by RAJEEV GUPTA, KARTHIK KUMAR. PIERRE YANNEY, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 6, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Hillcrest Labs., Inc. v. Movea, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 6, 2017
2016-1738 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Hillcrest Labs., Inc. v. Movea, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HILLCREST LABORATORIES, INC., Appellant v. MOVEA, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 6, 2017

Citations

2016-1738 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2017)