Opinion
2:22-cv-00406-RFB-VCF
12-21-2022
HILLCREST INVESTMENTS, LTD., a foreign corporation; HILLCREST PROJECTS, LLC., a foreign limited liability company; Plaintiffs, v. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign entity; QUAIL VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, a foreign entity; 11239, LLC, a foreign entity; R.A.M.M. CORP., a Nevada Corporation; Defendants.
MITCHELL S. BISSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 011920 LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL S. BISSON Attorney for Plaintiffs
MITCHELL S. BISSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 011920
LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL S. BISSONAttorney for Plaintiffs
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF 38] (FIRST REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs Hillcrest Investments, Ltd. and Hillcrest Projects, LLC (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, Mitchell S. Bisson, Esq., and Defendant Quail Valley Water District (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, Daniel N. Raytis, Esq. of Belden Blaine Raytis, LLP (admitted pro hac vice), hereby jointly submit this stipulation and order to extend Plaintiffs' deadline to file its Response to Defendant's Joinder in Defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim; or in the Alternative, Defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(E) (ECF No. 38, filed and served on December 7, 2022), from December 21, 2022 to January 6, 2023.
Pursuant to meet and confer efforts by the Parties, including mutual stipulation reached by and through counsel of record for the Parties, this is a first and only request for an extension of Plaintiffs' Response and/or Opposition deadline. Plaintiffs and Defendant remain engaged in good faith resolution discussions and attempts to resolve this action. This Stipulation is for the purpose of facilitating efforts related thereto, as well as because Plaintiffs' counsel was out of the office for a week dealing with family medical issues and this stipulation is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. Nothing herein shall affect Defendant's right(s) to file and serve any necessary Reply to any Response and/or Opposition filed by Plaintiffs. All associated moving paper deadlines shall be reset pursuant to any extension ordered by the Court. This shall be a first and final request for extension of Plaintiffs' responsive pleading deadline, and no further request for extension thereof shall be filed with the Court.
ORDER
Based upon the stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.