Opinion
2:21-cv-00964-RFB-NJK
11-21-2022
HILLCREST INVESTMENTS, LTD., a Canadian Corporation; AMERGOSA ENTERPRISE, LLC., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BORATE COMPANY, a foreign corporation; AMERICAN BORATE COMPANY of Texas, a foreign corporation; STATE ENGINEER, STATE OF NEVADA; DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES, a Nevada Political Subdivision; RAMM CORPORATION, a Nevada Corporation; UNITED STATES FISH AND WILD SERVICE, a division of the UNITED STATES; NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, a division of the UNITED STATES; DOES I - V; and ROES VI - X, Defendants.
HANKS LAW GROUP Karen L. Hanks, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Hillcrest Investments, Ltd LEONARD LAW, PC Debbie Leonard, Esq. Attorney for American Borate Company and American Borate Company of Texas LAW OFFICES OF BYRON THOMAS Bryon Thomas, Esq. Attorney for Amergosa Enterprise, LLC and On behalf of himself individually
HANKS LAW GROUP
Karen L. Hanks, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Hillcrest Investments, Ltd
LEONARD LAW, PC
Debbie Leonard, Esq.
Attorney for American Borate Company and American Borate Company of Texas
LAW OFFICES OF BYRON THOMAS
Bryon Thomas, Esq.
Attorney for Amergosa Enterprise, LLC and On behalf of himself individually
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS'AMERICAN BORATE COMPANY AND AMERICAN BORATE COMPANY OF TEXAS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
(ELEVENTH REQUEST)
Plaintiffs, HILLCREST INVESTMENTS, LTD. and AMERGOSA ENTERPRISE, LLC (“Plaintiffs”), Defendants, AMERICAN BORATE COMPANY AND AMERICAN BORATE COMPANY OF TEXAS (collectively “American Borate”) and non-party attorney BYRON THOMAS, ESQ., (“Thomas”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
On June 28, 2022, American Borate filed a renewed motion for sanctions against Plaintiffs and Thomas. Based on the filing of a previous stipulation, Plaintiffs' and Thomas' response is due November 18, 2022. Hillcrest and American Borate have diligently been negotiating settlement.
American Borate needs additional time to consider the Plaintiffs' and Thomas' latest offer. As a result, the parties agree to extend Plaintiffs' and Thomas' response deadline to December 9, 2022.
The parties do not seek this extension to cause delay or prejudice any party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.