From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 17, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0803 GGH (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0803 GGH.

November 17, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket # 4). By order filed August 9, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. In the August 9th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. On September 3, 2010, plaintiff was granted an extension of time until October 4, 2010, to submit his amended complaint. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the August 9, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

DATED: November 16, 2010


Summaries of

Hill v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 17, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0803 GGH (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Hill v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN LEE HILL, Plaintiff, v. JIMMY WALKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 17, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0803 GGH (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2010)