From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Villery-Samuel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Apr 3, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-590 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 3, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-590

04-03-2020

AARON CHARLES HILL, Plaintiff, v. SEAN VILLERY-SAMUEL, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Aaron Charles Hill, an inmate currently confined at the Hightower Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Sean Villery-Samuel, the State of Texas, the Beaumont Police Department, Judge Rachel West, Assistant Chief District Attorney Ashley Mofino, Detective Cindy Phillips and the Jefferson County Sheriff Department.

Judge West's correct name is Raquel West.

The correct spelling is Ashley Molfino.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A without prejudice to plaintiff's right to re-file if and when plaintiff can demonstrate his criminal conviction has been invalidated.

The Magistrate Judge also recommended that the dismissal was without prejudice to plaintiff's right to re-file without paying the filing fee as plaintiff has paid the full filing fee in this action. --------

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

This court can find nor error in the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. A judgment in favor of plaintiff would necessarily imply the invalidity of the duration of plaintiff's confinement. Pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, a complaint must be dismissed unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that a proceeding relating to the duration of his confinement has already been invalidated. 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). Plaintiff's habeas petition relating to his conviction is still pending. Hill v. Director, 1:19-CV-15. Furthermore, plaintiff's claims against defendant West and Mofino are barred by absolute immunity. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 525 (1985).

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is PARTIALLY ADOPTED, to the extent it recommends dismissal. A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 3rd day of April, 2020.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. Villery-Samuel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Apr 3, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-590 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Hill v. Villery-Samuel

Case Details

Full title:AARON CHARLES HILL, Plaintiff, v. SEAN VILLERY-SAMUEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Apr 3, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-590 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 3, 2020)