From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Torres

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
2:22-cv-0970-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0970-EFB P

06-15-2022

CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, v. M. TORRES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but has failed to properly respond to all of the questions asked therein. Specifically, plaintiff failed to respond to the question requesting the amount of money he has in cash or in a checking or savings account. See ECF No. 8 at 2 (stating “confidential”).

Accordingly, plaintiff's request (ECF No. 8) is denied without prejudice to filing a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Hill v. Torres

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
2:22-cv-0970-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Hill v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, v. M. TORRES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-0970-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)