From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Thomas

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv902-TMH (M.D. Ala. Feb. 1, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv902-TMH

02-01-2012

CARMICE REON HILL, #167507, Plaintiff, v. KIM THOMAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND OPINION

On January 12, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 10). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(3)(2)(b)(I) and (ii).

Truman M. Hobbs

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. Thomas

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv902-TMH (M.D. Ala. Feb. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:CARMICE REON HILL, #167507, Plaintiff, v. KIM THOMAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 1, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv902-TMH (M.D. Ala. Feb. 1, 2012)