From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Tampkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 22, 2017
No. EDCV 16-1141 DSF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2017)

Opinion

No. EDCV 16-1141 DSF (FFM)

05-22-2017

MALCOLM VINCENT HILL, Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA TAMPKINS, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed with prejudice as time-barred. DATED: 5/22/17

/s/_________

DALE S. FISCHER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hill v. Tampkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 22, 2017
No. EDCV 16-1141 DSF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Hill v. Tampkins

Case Details

Full title:MALCOLM VINCENT HILL, Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA TAMPKINS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 22, 2017

Citations

No. EDCV 16-1141 DSF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2017)