From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Stukey

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 26, 2024
4:24-cv-00518-JM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Aug. 26, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-00518-JM-JTK

08-26-2024

ADAM HILL, ADC #601559 PLAINTIFF v. STUKEY, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Defendants Hutchinson, Bolden, and Holmes are TERMINATED as parties to this action because there are no claims pending against them;

2. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Stukey, Huff, Kerstein, Smith, Conley, Griffin, Horan, Saih, Culp, Wyman, and Rester are DISMISSED because these Defendants are not properly joined in this lawsuit;

3. Defendants Stuckey, Huff, Kerstein, Smith, Conley, Griffin, Horan, Saih, Culp, Wyman, and Rester are TERMINATED as parties to this action; and

4. Plaintiff's official capacity claims against Defendant Billingsley are DISMISSED as duplicative.


Summaries of

Hill v. Stukey

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 26, 2024
4:24-cv-00518-JM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Aug. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Hill v. Stukey

Case Details

Full title:ADAM HILL, ADC #601559 PLAINTIFF v. STUKEY, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Aug 26, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-00518-JM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Aug. 26, 2024)