From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Strong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-01774 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-01774 CKD P

04-05-2018

CYMEYON HILL Plaintiff, v. TIAN STRONG, Defendant.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed February 5, 2018, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be randomly assigned to a United States District Judge.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: April 5, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Hill1774.fta(1).docx


Summaries of

Hill v. Strong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-01774 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2018)
Case details for

Hill v. Strong

Case Details

Full title:CYMEYON HILL Plaintiff, v. TIAN STRONG, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 5, 2018

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-01774 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2018)