Opinion
No. 05-04-01167-CR
Opinion Filed February 22, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F01-48683-PM. Affirmed.
Before Justices WHITTINGTON, BRIDGES, and LANG-MIERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Corey Lee Hill appeals the trial court's judgment adjudicating his guilt for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Punishment was assessed at five years of confinement. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant filed a pro se response claiming there are four arguable issues for appeal. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We affirm the trial court's judgment.