From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 23, 1966
185 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 6517.

February 23, 1966.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record of Polk County, Roy H. Amidon, J.

Thomas W. Perkins, of Edmund Perkins, Lake Alfred, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.


The State has moved to dismiss this appeal because of the dereliction of the attorney for the appellant in failing to timely file his brief.

The record of this court shows:

(1) That on July 28, 1965, the Criminal Court of Record of Polk County entered an order extending the time for filing the transcript of record.

(2) On October 25, 1965, a motion was filed in this court for an extension of time to file appellant's brief, which was denied without prejudice to apply to the trial court.

(3) The Criminal Court of Record, on November 3, 1965, extended the time for filing the appellant's brief for 30 days, which made appellant's brief due December 2, 1965. The brief was not filed.

(4) On January 7, 1966, appellant's attorney filed a second motion to extend time in which to file the brief in question. This court denied the extension January 11, 1966. Appellant's brief, with the various extensions of time, was due to be filed on December 2, 1965.

The rules are made to be followed and not trifled with.

The attorney representing the appellant in this case has had quite a number of extensions. The State properly moved for the dismissal of the appeal because of the failure of the defendant's attorney to properly represent and protect this defendant.

To dismiss the appeal, when it may be meritorious, punishes the unfortunate appellant and not his attorney, who is supposedly representing and protecting his client's rights on this appeal. For this reason, we deny the motion of the State to dismiss the appeal and permit the attorney for the appellant to file a brief in this case.

After the State's brief has been filed, we will consider the briefs of the parties and dispose of the case without oral argument.

ALLEN, C.J., and LILES and HOBSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 23, 1966
185 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Hill v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR HILL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 23, 1966

Citations

185 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Paula v. State

Appellant has also been granted one extension by the trial court. In this case we have dereliction of the…

Hill v. State

Affirmed. See also Fla.App., 185 So.2d 759.…