From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb 5, 2019
266 So. 3d 1229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D17-4754

02-05-2019

Troy HILL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Troy Hill, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Troy Hill, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.The writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Erlinger v. Federico , 242 So.3d 1177, 1182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (holding that unfavorable legal rulings do not provide grounds for disqualification).

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb 5, 2019
266 So. 3d 1229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Hill v. State

Case Details

Full title:Troy HILL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Feb 5, 2019

Citations

266 So. 3d 1229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)